Harry and Meghan: will they settle in the Cotswolds or Redcar?

SPECULATION at to where Harry and Meghan will make their UK home is at fever pitch. Will it be the Cotswolds, or the north-eastern seaside town of Redcar? We assess: 

The Cotswolds: home to the wealthy

Aristocrats, Kate Moss and hedge-fund managers would be the Sussexes’ neighbours. To such people the loss of their HRH titles or owing £34 million to the Daily Mail’s lawyers are a mark of shame, gossiped about at every party. They would be a laughing stock.

Redcar: home to the unemployed

By contrast, the social scene in Redcar would welcome the couple with open arms, with peers accustomed to loss of status, losing court cases, and being estranged from high-and-mighty family who think they’re so much f**king better than you. They would fit right in.

The Cotswolds: handy for London

With the capital just a short journey, the Cotswolds are close to Harry’s family and their many palatial homes. Awkward, given that Harry is persona non grata with all of them and will not be invited to meals. The froideur will be felt all the way down the M4.

Redcar: handy for Middlesbrough

While in cheerful no-frills Redcar, Wills and Kate would feel as blessedly distant as they did in California. Dad wouldn’t drop by unexpectedly for stilted conversation, and there’s always Middlesbrough should Meg need to stock up on Primark clothing for the kids.

The Cotswolds: honey-coloured stone

The warm, golden Jurassic limestone used to build the homes in the Cotswolds gives the villages their characteristic glow. Which would only remind the couple of the Montecito home they had to leave behind, and make them sad.

Redcar: soot-blackened slate

Up in Redcar there are no colours. Looking out onto the North Sea from a town still stained by the pollution of the steel industry is the real Britain: ugly, rainswept, and bleak. This is the Britain Harry missed, not some moneyed enclave with a branch of Soho House.

Verdict: Redcar

Harry and Meghan are certain to choose Redcar, with its high deprivation, child poverty and retirees suffering long-term industrial illnesses, as their new home. Even the Daily Mail will not send journalists up there, and they can afford a whole row of terraces.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Nine cute nicknames you've tried to give your boyfriend

COUPLED up? Time to irritate him with a wide selection of names you love and he abhors, not that it’s about to stop you calling him these: 

‘Muffin’

You say it is because he’s sweet. It isn’t until you visit his family in Lancashire you realise that to them and him a muffin is a bread roll, and that’s what confused him.

‘Smooches’

He accepted it once during sex, but not when you’re trying to get his attention while watching Arsenal vs Chelsea in a packed pub. Weird.

‘Harry Potter’

He wore his glasses before bed one time and that’s enough for you to start singing the theme tune whenever he takes out his lenses. Perhaps because Harry Potter is the most sexless character in all of literature?

‘Snugglebug’

Would be cute if he was five and not 32. His mum used to call him it, making it either cuter or an ethical violation.

‘My little gremlin’

Can be a bit insulting depending on whether or not he’s annoyed you. And like you can’t feed gremlins after midnight, you shouldn’t say this during sex.

‘Babycakes’

You thought it was adorable and it was a hit song back in the day. He feels it implies he has the arse of a small child.

‘Sweet cheeks’

Grabbing his arse while saying it allows you to get away with it maybe 60 per cent of the time. Is used less when he’s suffering horrendous flatulence.

‘Boo bear’

Seems lovely when you’re saying it, until you see his face crumple in distaste as his response. Plans to buy him a teddy for his birthday are shelved.

‘Wifey’

Yes, he’s a man but you’ve promoted him. Oddly he doesn’t care for it. So much for his wanting to smash the patriarchy.