PEOPLE who opposed lockdowns have taken the findings of the Covid inquiry to mean they were bang-on the entire time.
Having quickly scanned the findings, opponents of the UK going into lockdown have come to the conclusion that their misguided protests and incessant conspiracy tweets were brilliantly correct from the start.
Lockdown opponent Martin Bishop said: “Forget the paragraphs where the report specifies how lockdowns could’ve been avoided. Those are trivial details that undermine our argument.
“The main thing to focus on is that lockdowns were needless government oppression. Which is what I tried to tell my family by bombarding them with links to dodgy articles before my wife and kids moved out. They must be feeling pretty stupid right about now.”
Fellow contrarian Nikki Hollis said: “Bet this stings for everyone who trusts the lamestream media. Turns out us free-thinking sceptics weren’t wrong after all if you’re willing to overlook several important details.
“And to think if you’d listened to us from the start then 23,000 people could still be with us. Don’t ask me to point out exactly where the inquiry says that, but trust me it’s all in there. We’ll accept your apology when you’re ready.”
Staunch anti-vaxxer Norman Steele said: “Strangely the inquiry didn’t mention it all being a Big Pharma hoax. Clearly my research on Facebook was better. I’ll send them some articles by nutters.”
