US joining strikes on Iran and definitely isn't: five contradictory conclusions from Trump's latest bullshit

PRESIDENT Trump has issued a number of non-specific threats against Iran which the country and the world is trying to make sense of. These are the possibilities: 

US to launch airstrikes on Iran or not to do that

Trump likes being belligerent but doesn’t like wars, and wants everyone to be scared of him without his actually doing anything. His threats towards Iran are, therefore, mainly based on what Israel is already doing and require no action on the US’s part. The equivalent of standing behind a hard mate and egging on a confrontation.

The “Supreme Leader” to be killed or not to be

Casually revealing confidential information, Trump revealed he knows where Ayatollah Khamenei is, that he would be an easy target but is safe for now. Guaranteeing that he is moved immediately and whoever was told last time isn’t. The warning ‘our patience is wearing thin’ goes double for the pissed-off Mossad.

“UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER” 

There is no official state of war. No demands have been outlined. The US isn’t even involved. Who is Iran surrendering to? Is it being asked to dump its whole nuclear programme? To stop funding Hamas? To sit quietly and accept being bombed? To all, as a nation, put their hands in the air and say sorry?

‘The president may feel he needs to take action to end Iranian enrichment’ 

A pronouncement from JD Vance, who knows nothing. Being in the same room as a ranting Trump does not bestow wisdom. This is his best guess, based on a monologue that ranged from golfer cock size to the wild fury of escaped polar bears. Has he confused Iranian enrichment and uranium enrichment? Because he’s not bright.

‘Much bigger than a ceasefire’ 

Trump left the G7 early to work on something ‘much bigger than a ceasefire’ which answers nothing. What’s bigger than a ceasefire? War? Peace? Two ceasefires? Contact with an alien civilisation? All these questions can be answered with one word: bullshit. It’s all bullshit which might, nonetheless, end the world.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Samuel Smith's pubs far f**king freakier than Wetherspoons, UK agrees

BRITISH drinkers have agreed both Samuel Smith and Wetherspoons pubs are freakshows with an alcohol license but the former has the edge. 

While both are deliberately atmosphere-free with menus chosen to discourage diners and a clientele like a grim warning of your alcoholic future, Wetherspoons does not make you hide your phone under the table as if you were at school.

Beer drinker Nathan Muir said: “While most pubs endeavour to make their premises as hospitable as possible, Samuel Smith is perversely pushing in the opposite direction.

“No music. No TV, laptops or phones, as if you’d wandered into a particularly dour and obsessive 1950s re-enactment club looking for a nice pint.

“Speaking of which, they only have their own weird brands. Want a Guinness? Tough shit, you’re having Taddy Porter, whatever the f**k that is. How about a Nut Brown Ale? Tastes as vile as licking Nigel Farage.

“Plus you’re not allowed to swear, so God forbid you get tipsy and gregarious and drop in a ‘shite’ while chatting your mates. They call the local bobby to wash your mouth out with soap.

“Wetherspoons is where you go when you’ve decided to drink yourself to death. That’s relatable. Samuel Smiths are the theme pub in the resettlement camp of an alternative fascist Britain.

“Still, the toilets don’t take ten minutes to walk to. Wetherspoons win on that front.”