RICHARD Dawkins last night singled out one religion for being an enemy of human development and rational thought instead of every last one of them.
The noted biologist and atheist highlighted the comparative lack of Islamic Nobel Prize winners, but forgot to mention that Christian winners had only succeeded by ignoring their particular strand of voodoo gibberish.
Dawkins said Trinity College, Cambridge had more laureates than all of Islam, prompting Islam to say it had more laureates than Buddhism, which in turn forced Buddhism to claim that science is ‘gay’.
But Professor Henry Brubaker, of the Institute for Studies, said: “If it wasn’t for religion the Nobel Prize would be a lot more competitive. Do you realise how much scientific time we wasted staring at a cloud, asking god to kill people we don’t like?
“Implying that Islam is worse than Christianity is like saying Godfather III is worse than Indiana Jones IV.
“And by the way, all those who are somehow ‘disappointed’ by Professor Dawkins’ ‘leadership’ need to understand that atheism having a figurehead is inherently absurd.
“I don’t need someone to tell me how not to believe in God. I’m excellent at it. I can even not believe in God while I’m doing other things.”
Professor Brubaker also revealed that the Institute for Studies had, so far, failed to win any Nobel Prizes, but insisted it was only because the work they do is very poor.
He added: “The Dr Who fan club has more Nobel winners than anyone. More than 80 percent of laureates since 1965 have drawn up detailed plans for a driverless metro system on Gallifrey.
“Meanwhile, the number of ginger Nobel winners is surprisingly high.