Gen Z: are they discarding valuable societal prejudices against ginger people?

THE win of Angry Ginge on I’m A Celebrity raises a disturbing question. Are Gen Z no longer committing to long-held prejudice about the gingers? 

Society has barely recovered from the damage done by woke millennials determined that sexism, racism and anti-trans bigotry were bad things, but at least they knew never to violate the ultimate taboo.

It’s one so ingrained it rarely needs mentioning. Politeness forbids it. There are no laws against them because they’re not needed; the reaction is instinctive.

But today we must contemplate the very real risk that by not speaking against the ginger menace, we have allowed our children to believe it is acceptable. That gingers are people like any other and deserving of kindness.

How else can this victory be explained? He wears his shame in his very name, for God’s sake. ‘Angry Ginge’. Of course he’s angry. Angry at being made that way. Angry that even dye cannot hide it. Angry at a world that hates and fears him. And for this he wins votes?

What next? Political office? After all, Nigel Farage only came third in the jungle, and he is certain to become our next prime minister. Could Angry Ginge follow suit?

An apocalypse would follow. 13,000 years of anti-ginger prejudice would be violently avenged, the streets red with normals’ blood. You think they’d forget and forgive? You don’t know the fire of hatred that burns behind their watery eyes.

Democracy would be torn down. Prince Harry, a ginger who nonetheless married a woman, would be their leader, Rupert Grint his minister for war. Allying with the redheads of Ireland he would invade Europe on the pretext of freeing his despised brethren.

It must not be allowed to happen. Gen Z, so commendably intolerant in other ways, must be warned explicitly of the risk they take. Gingers must stay in their place, and Angry Ginge can continue his rants on YouTube while he is fired into the sun.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Grandad terrified he'll be next victim of AI deepfake porn

A RETIRED 80-year-old with no social media presence is understandably afraid his likeness will be stolen to generate pornographic deepfakes on the dark web. 

Octogenarian Norman Steele has asked that all pictures his grandchildren might have posted online of him in the past decade are scrubbed from the internet to protect him from becoming a victim of explicit revenge porn.

He explained: “I read in the paper that these AI gadgets take your face and put it on someone else’s body, making it look like you’re doing something you never did. Like having it off with the woman on top.

“While I wish I was romping with Kylie Minogue, and I could now Mary’s gone, it’s not appropriate for any Tom, Dick or Harry to make that into a video and share it around for everyone to see. Indonesia could be watching that nightly and I wouldn’t know.

“You might think I’m being paranoid, but I could see the treasurer of the lawn bowls club retaliating like this after I accused him of cheating last August. He’s got a computer with megarams.

“And quite frankly I’m afraid to go to the Post Office and pay my gas bill because everyone in there could have been watching me giving it both barrels to those Sugababes on their phones and laughing. It’s elder abuse.”

He added: “I’ve asked my grandson to search the web for it. He says he there’s nothing there, but I worry he hasn’t spelled ‘Steele’ with all three Es.”