Podcaster Jade Grimes doggedly investigates the latest crimes despite her complete lack of qualifications to do so and police pleas to stop
THIS week’s story is so chilling it’ll make you want to swap your summery Starbucks Frappuccino for a piping hot Starbucks Grande Mochaccino. Remember to use my discount code CRIME for ten per cent off your next coffee at any participating Starbucks (not including Scotland or drive thrus).
You’ll know that I try to spotlight cases that don’t get a lot of attention – things like pretty white women going missing in mysterious circumstances. I try to avoid anything too obvious like hate crimes or police brutality, because I know the BBC will cover them.
But this case, though admittedly different from what I normally cover (and a bit boring), really grabbed hold of me, because it happened just 100 miles from where I live.
I think we all assume that murders happen mainly in America. It’s really easy to commit a murder there, and far more socially acceptable. I often thank my lucky stars I was born in Kingston upon Thames and not Killtown upon Mississippi.
Our story this week is of Mr Nathan Muir, who was found dead in his garden in April, having been stabbed. The prime suspect? His wife, Carolyn, who had recently found out about an affair he’d been having with their daughter’s nanny.
Here comes the bombshell. This salacious story didn’t happen in Los Angeles, but in the English village of Sweppley in Sussex.
When I Google image searched Sweppley, I thought I’d see a gangland filled with burnt-out cars and crack dens. Instead, I saw that they have a David Lloyd. Nathan was an estate agent, and Carolyn had a catering business. How could people so upstanding be driven to become a murder victim and murderer, respectively? The British mind boggles that the two of them couldn’t just sit down and discuss their problems over a nice cup of tea.
Naturally, such a bizarre and unnatural story gives you pause. I bet a lot of you, like me, have got questions. What was the motive? If it was the affair, why would Carolyn mind, when Nathan had had at least three other affairs before? How did Carolyn even get her hands on the cake knife thought to have killed him?
Such obvious inconsistencies make you wonder what else the police might have got wrong. Is Nathan actually dead, or did he sustain a simple injury that didn’t even require a trip to A&E? For all we know, he’s in the Dordogne right now, and the mutilated body on the slab is actually that of a New Jersey drug dealer, flown here in error, then dressed in corduroy.
True crime fans, I ask you – what seems more likely?