Leonardo DiCaprio, and other stars who trick decent people into watching arthouse films

NOT content with multi-million paychecks, duplicitous stars love nothing more than to con their audiences by fooling them into watching serious cinema. We name and shame:  

Leonardo DiCaprio

Typecast as a clichéd heartthrob so often that playing Gatsby was a legal obligation, Leo decided that to let his fans down not just by dating young but by working with provocative filmmakers to make arty movies nobody enjoys. Usually cast as a Wall Street bastard, slaveowner or red-faced hippy, to make getting offscreen shags more of a challenge.

Scarlett Johansson

Johansson as a hot sex-craving alien is the stuff of fantasy until you’ve seen it. Under The Skin portrayed banging Scarlett as being ghostly men drowning in black liquid, which is not likely how ex-partners remember it. Yes, she still did a Jurassic Park film this summer, but there’s a sneaking suspicion she doesn’t really mean it.

Robert Pattinson

The vampire nonsense was a decent start for the young lad, but contemptibly he has not only cheekbones but ambition. Ambition that’s seen him appear in arty films by Werner Herzog, Claire Denis and Robert Eggers where his characters masturbate and have grizzled beards, confirming prejudices of how shite arthouse cinema is to his fans who just want Batmobile car chases.

Emma Stone

Going from Superbad’s love interest to a baby’s brain in a woman’s body working in a brothel is quite the flex, if you consider tottering around with a quizzical expression as the pinnacle of art. For poor men who fancied Emma Stone in Spider-Man it’s a classic bait-and-switch: yes, there will be boob exposure. But you have to get through a Yorgos Lanthimos movie.

Adam Sandler

Paul Thomas Anderson, already guilty of giving Mark Wahlberg a career and making Daniel Day-Lewis retire, is to blame for casting a one-note comedian in his arty movie. Ever since, viewers wanting silly jokes and slapstick violence have had to tread carefully in case this is one of the serious ones. Unfair and grounds for a class-action lawsuit.

Daniel Radcliffe

You’re 22, you will always be remembered as a child wizard, and now you’ve got to have a career? So Dan treated his fandom to all sorts of acting experiments, from growing demon horns to playing a farting corpse on an island. None of those worked, leading him to the path of no return of Samuel Beckett on stage. And there was still a poor Harry Potter fan in the front row.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Man who has listened to nothing but Iron Maiden for 40 years to give Taylor Swift a go

A 59-YEAR-OLD metal fan has decided that since there is such a fuss about it, he will give Taylor Swift’s new one a spin. 

Bus driver Tom Booker has been a metalhead all his life, but after four decades of lyrics based on Aleister Crowley books or the life of Alexander the Great was looking for a change of pace.

He said: “It’s been Maiden for me since Powerslave in ’84. The galloping bass runs of Steve Harris, the operatic wailings of Bruce Dickinson, and they always keep it proper heavy.

“But I heard some girls discussing this Swift on the bus and well, all that stuff about death, demons, and the cruelty of man toward man does get a bit samey. What are her albums about? Herself? Well, Maiden have never done a 14-minute metal epic about that.

“I’d always thought she was more of a singles artist which Maiden aren’t, unless you count their 1990 number one single Bring Your Daughter… to the Slaughter which I don’t because it was shit.

“But I’ll give this Swift one a go. Can’t do any harm.”

After listening, Booker said: “Did I enjoy it? No. Was it a change of pace after 40 years of basically the same song over and over again? Sure. Has it given me a new appreciation of Maiden? Yes.”