When will Starmer release a video of himself engaged in sexual intercourse with our flag?

KEIR Starmer claims to love the flag. Nonsense. He may take it home but there as yet exists no evidence that he then accompanies it to bed. 

Indeed, it’s hard to believe this pasty, passionless man even watches a horror film with the the flag, drawing closer to it on the sofa during jump scares before beginning to caress it caringly and then more forcefully.

Certainly no true Briton – ie voting Conservative or further right – can give credence to the idea that Starmer engages in passionate foreplay with the banner of our nation, stimulating its erogenous zones expertly yet with a teasing touch.

And progressing to oral? Drawing the folds of the flag aside and going at its secret core with his ham-pink tongue, driving it into frenzied ecstasy before demanding it do the same for him? Literally nobody pictures it while waiting for the bus.

So it logically follows that full penetrative intercourse, Starmer on top and the Union Jack taking it, his pallid buttocks rising and falling as he thrusts into the very heart of Britishness, is inconceivable. Ask anyone. It has never come to mind.

We must conclude, therefore, that our prime minister is lying. That while he says ‘we will never surrender our flag’ he has no right to claim it, for he has not consummated the relationship.

He has only one option. He must be filmed seducing the flag, undressing the flag, and banging the flag. We must see it going in and evidence that he finished.

If Starmer does not release such a video within the next seven days, then he officially does not love the Union Jack, hates Britain, and cedes full control of it to a man who adores it, treats it like a princess and regularly gives it a proper seeing-to, like Tommy Robinson.

Go on, Sir Keir. Bang the flag on camera. Your premiership will be secure after that.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Laziness, and other things women mistake for commitment

FINALLY met a guy without commitment issues? That can’t possibly be true. You must have mistaken one of these for willingness to swear lifelong monogamous devotion: 

Housing issues

Has he brought a backpack to the date, or worse a hobo’s bindle? Did he mention moving in before the starter? Is in a band? Then he’s of no fixed abode and fixing to move into yours, less to be with you every waking moment and more in the hope of a hot shower and no one fighting him for his tent outside Morrison’s.

Upcoming convalescence

‘No, we’re not moving too fast,’ he says, thinking of the date on his calendar marked ‘OPERATION must find carer!!’ He’d like you to move in, bringing your sexy nurse outfit, and look after him full-time until he recovers from the ligament damage he heroically suffered playing five-a-side. When he’s better, he’ll gratefully dump you.

Home cooking

Weddings are expensive, but more than 364 days of Deliveroo? Leaving out that one July day he does a barbecue. Paying upfront means having someone cook for him for the rest of his life and probably extending it by five years by keeping his fat fingers off the chips. Whether those years will be enjoyable for either party is debatable.

Sheer laziness

Finding a flat is hard, yours is nice, his mate Dave’s got a van. Easy decision. As a treat he’ll pay for Sky Sports. This may not be true love, but you’re familiar with one another’s sexual shortcomings. While he pretends to miss your hints about marriage, deep down he knows it’s less effort than all that swiping right and pretending to listen on dates.

Being a serial killer

Psychopaths favour living with spouses as it gives them an alibi if the police come sniffing around. He insists on a house with a garden? Does a lot of digging late at night? Ah well, it’ll do. And even if he does see other women, it’s never for long.