GETTING so excited by a select committee hearing that you pronounce the end of the prime minister can only be a sex thing, experts believe.
On the third occasion in ten days where commentators are breathlessly hyping a ‘day of reckoning’ for Starmer despite the fact that it will not be, the only rational explanation is that it is getting a whole lot of people off.
Dr Helen Archer, sexual wellness consultant, said: “Politically, they must know a hundred Labour MPs aren’t voting for an enquiry when there’s an enquiry already going on. So it must be something else.
“And given the feverish quality, the desperate need it is clearly filling, the demand for more and more climactic events after the last one proved unsatisfying, there can be little doubt this is the Westminster equivalent of a late-night sweaty hate-f**k.
“They know it’s achieving nothing, they know it’s disgusting, they know they should stop but it just feels so good they can’t stop themselves. Then afterwards the only way they can handle the disappointment and shame is to schedule another select committee hearing.
“I keep saying, the healthy way to deal with these urges is to work on your own party and make them electorally appealing. They know that. But then they get rock hard at the thought of another ‘doomsday for Starmer headline’ and we’re back where we started.”
Parliamentary correspondent Mary Fisher said: “Sir Philip Barton’s just declined to answer whether correct procedure was followed when Olly Robbins was sacked. And I’ve come.”