Why I'm proud to represent Britain's snake-oil salesmen, by Nigel Farage

DEAR oh dear. The prime minister has exposed his contempt for Britain’s decent, hardworking snake-oil salesmen. Well, I’m not ashamed to say I’m their champion.

This great country was built on the backs of snake oil and its derivatives. From the Crusades to the glory days of the British Empire, snake-oil merchants have been there, laying a comforting groundwork of deception.

Whether it’s good old-fashioned essence-of-cobra, leeches, ineffective nosegays full of herbs to protect against the Black Death or simply the dishonest men of the C of E, they’re a key part of our cultural heritage.

That’s why I’m enormously proud to represent this much maligned trade, whether by campaigning for Brexit or leading Reform. For too long this nation’s honest frauds, hoodwinkers and shit-stirrers have been politically homeless. No more.

Of course I know I’m peddling bollocks. That’s the point. The art of the trade lies in making blatant fabrications sound convincing, while also offering attractive solutions. It’s the sort of proper graft the prime minister is unfamiliar with.

My slimy character and brash charisma may be unappealing to some disdainful of the hallmarks of a phoney industry dating back to the 19th century. Snobs, I call them. It’s taken years to hone this repellent persona, but the results speak for themselves.

It all comes down to business. Being a shyster isn’t just woven into our nation’s identity, it also rakes in money for the economy. Can you imagine our high streets without CBD oil, micellar water or caffeine shampoos? Of course not.

We are a nation built on fraudulent cure-alls. So if the prime minister wants to tar me with the same brush as liars and swindlers, I say go ahead. You’ve just driven millions of crooks into my openly corrupt arms.

Sign up now to get
The Daily Mash
free Headlines email – every weekday
privacy

Should you cash in on the lifting of the two-child benefit cap by having a third child?

LABOUR is set to raise the two-child benefit cap, meaning households can maximise state payouts by adding a third, fourth or fifth child. We weigh up the pros and cons: 

PRO

Pulling down a sweet £17.25 per week, or a possible £17,940 lifetime total? Who’s going to turn that down? You’ve already got all the stuff from having your first two kids and they can help out with the baby. Or babies, if you decide to ring that cash register again and again. Jackpot!

CON

There are questions about whether £17.25 is enough, given inflation, to feed a child even if all their clothes are hand-me-downs and they’re living that Harry Potter under-stairs life. It should be, surely? The government wouldn’t provide a less than adequate sum for our nation’s future?

PRO

It’s not just money. Pumping out a few more brats means you take priority for social housing, roadside breakdown callouts and auditions for amateur performances of The Sound of Music. More than adequate compensation for having to drive a minibus.

CON

There are people, those who have failed to heed the TikTok tradwife gospel, who believe raising children is hard and gets harder the more of them there are. Only first-hand testimony so easily dismissed, though there may be a kernel of truth in it. But then why would lazy benefits claimants have so many?

PRO

Western nations are in demographic crisis with fewer and fewer children being born, and this saddens people like the late Charlie Kirk. Honouring his memory and conceiving ever more children is the right thing to do. Note: only applies to white people.

CON

Charlie Kirk’s brief moment of fame in this country has passed as swiftly as Shaboozey’s, and our British pro-natalists are unpleasant, leering old men who write unhinged columns for the Telegraph. Copulating in their shadow would not be easy and any child born of it would be indelibly marked.

CONCLUSION

Conceive a third child only after taking advice from money saving expert Martyn Lewis, and if possible under his supervision.